Analyze the intervention following 4 steps:
1. Summarizing the situation on the ground in the country affected by a non-traditional security issue; 2. Citing the doctrines that required the international community’s intervention or non- intervention in that country;
3. Examining the realist, liberal, or other arguments for or against this intervention;
4. Explaining how the intervention was planned, organized, commanded, co-ordinated, and implemented; Assessing the results, effectiveness, or success of the intervention or non-intervention. Was this situation made better or worse by the intervention or non-intervention? Why do you think so?
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|